The 70% Problem: How IT Spending on “Keeping the Lights On” Is Killing Innovation

Talk to an Expert

January 23, 2026 - by Synoptek

The truth is that most IT leaders are not overspending. However, they might be misallocating IT spending in ways that quietly restrict growth.

Across industries, nearly 70% of IT budgets are allocated to maintenance and operations, including infrastructure upkeep, security patching, support, and compliance. While these investments are essential, they absorb the majority of available funding, leaving little room for innovation.

This creates a growing tension between stability and growth. In an AI-driven economy where speed, adaptability, and experience define competitive advantage, IT can no longer exist solely to “keep the lights on.” When IT spending is dominated by run-the-business activities, innovation doesn’t fail because of a lack of ideas; it fails because it never gets the capacity to scale.

The result is an IT function optimized for survival, not progress.

The “Run vs. Grow” Imbalance in IT Spending

Historically, IT budgets were designed to ensure reliability and reduce risk. Today, they must also fuel innovation.

Most organizations divide IT spending into two categories:

  • Run: Infrastructure, service management, cybersecurity, compliance, and legacy applications
  • Grow: Cloud modernization, automation, AI, analytics, and experience platforms

Industry benchmarks indicate that high-performing organizations typically allocate 30–40% of their IT spending toward growth and innovation. This balance allows businesses to modernize while maintaining operational resilience.

Many organizations operate closer to a 70–85% run rate and 15–30% growth rate. Operational demands dominate decision-making, and innovation becomes something to pursue “once things stabilize.”

That moment rarely comes.

This imbalance persists due to risk aversion, short-term fixes that become permanent, fragmented decision-making across business units, and increasing baseline costs associated with security and compliance. Over time, IT spending becomes increasingly defensive, even as business expectations accelerate.

How Legacy Systems Undermine IT Cost Optimization

Legacy systems don’t just slow transformation; over a period of time, they quietly consume the financial oxygen of organizations.

While their costs are rarely visible as a single line item, legacy environments inflate IT spending through:

  • Ongoing maintenance and patching
  • Dependence on specialized, high-cost skills
  • Redundant tools performing overlapping functions
  • Infrastructure that limits automation and AI adoption

Tool sprawl and underutilized software licenses further erode budgets, creating hidden cost leakage that rarely gets reclaimed. Innovation initiatives struggle for funding, not because they lack value, but because budgets are already allocated.

As outlined in the whitepaper, modernization is not merely a technical upgrade; it is a core IT cost optimization strategy. Organizations that delay modernization redirect IT spending toward sustaining inefficiency.

Why Excessive Operational IT Spending Limits Innovation

When 85–90% of IT spending is tied to operations, the consequences extend well beyond the IT department.

Organizational experience:

  • Slower time-to-market as modernization initiatives stall
  • Limited ability to fund automation or AI at scale
  • Growing technical debt and higher outage risk
  • Burnout across IT teams trapped in reactive, firefighting modes

This is the cost of inaction. Systems remain functional, but the organization loses momentum. Competitors that rebalance their IT spending gain speed, resilience, and adaptability while others fall behind, despite having similar or even larger budgets.

Stability without progress eventually becomes risk.

The Cost of Inaction Is Real—Here’s the Full Framework

If this pattern sounds familiar, rising IT spending, limited innovation capacity, and increasing operational drag, you’re not alone.

The whitepaper, “The ROI of Experience: A Strategic IT Spending Framework for Growth and Efficiency,” explores:

  • Why nearly 70% of IT budgets get trapped in “run” activities
  • How leading organizations rebalance IT spending without sacrificing stability
  • Practical approaches to IT cost optimization
  • A 30-60-90 day roadmap to shift from maintenance-heavy IT to innovation-ready IT
New call-to-action

How a Managed Experience Provider Helps Rebalance IT Spending

Well, innovation doesn’t start with creating or getting just new platforms. Rather, it starts with visibility, accountability, and control.

An experience-led managed services provider model, often referred to as a Managed Experience Provider (MxP), approaches IT governance in a distinct manner. Rather than managing services in isolation, it connects cost, performance, and experience under a unified framework.

This approach enables:

  • Centralized visibility across cloud, applications, vendors, and services
  • AI-assisted observability that reduces operational overhead
  • Automation that lowers support costs while improving service quality
  • SLA-driven performance that ties service excellence directly to financial outcomes

In this model, service excellence becomes a lever for IT cost optimization, not an added expense. Reduced downtime, faster resolution, and predictable performance free up budget that can be reinvested in innovation and growth.

Practical Steps to Optimize IT Spending Without Sacrificing Stability

Rebalancing IT spending doesn’t require a massive transformation on day one. It starts with disciplined, measurable action.

Leaders can begin by:

  • Benchmarking current run vs. grow allocation
  • Identifying underutilized software and cloud waste
  • Rationalizing legacy systems with low ROI
  • Introducing SLA-based performance and cost metrics
  • Piloting automation or cloud optimization initiatives
  • Aligning IT spending with business KPIs—not just infrastructure metrics

These steps create early wins while laying the foundation for sustainable, experience-led financial governance.

Conclusion: Fix the 70% Problem Before It Fixes You

Innovation doesn’t fail because organizations lack ideas.  In most cases, it fails because IT spending leaves not enough room to act on them.

Leaders who rebalance IT spending gain agility, resilience, and AI readiness, without sacrificing operational stability; those who don’t remain trapped in an increasingly expensive cycle of maintenance and risk.

The real ROI of IT is not just about uptime but also momentum.